Survey clockUK
4 AI tools live7 core services10 expertise areasISO 45001ISO 14001ISO 9001NEBOSHIOSHISEP
Advisory activeActive
Surveying work area
AI Safety Suite · live now
Survey clockUK
4 AI tools live7 core services10 expertise areasISO 45001ISO 14001ISO 9001NEBOSHIOSHISEP
Advisory activeActive
Surveying work area
Risk & RAMS · live now
Turn activity and task information into a structured starting framework for hazards, controls and review priorities.
Risk & RAMS
00sections, every run
A practical first pass for turning incomplete information into a reviewable risk discussion.
Things to have ready
Checked before you invest
Sections in every output
The same shape, every run
Things it will not do
Stated up front
Built around evidence
Draft risk framework
Use the assistant to identify hazards, causes, people exposed and control options. A competent person must validate the result against the actual work.
Use the inputs to create a structured starting point for hazards, controls, ownership and review priorities.
Before you start
The tools are only as useful as the context you bring to them. Tick off what you already have to hand.
Context readiness
Nothing ticked yet.
Partial context still helps. It is more useful to start than to wait until you have everything.
The response
Structure, not a verdict. Every part below is a draft for a competent reviewer to accept, correct or reject.
Part 01
Hazards, causes and consequences
The task broken down far enough that the thinking is visible and arguable, rather than a single lumped entry.
Part 02
Who is exposed, and how
Exposure considered per hazard instead of assumed to be uniform across the task.
Part 03
Control options by hierarchy
Options ordered by where they sit in the hierarchy of control, so the conversation starts at prevention.
Part 04
Gaps to verify on site
What was assumed, what was missing, and which parts must be confirmed by someone who can see the work.
Getting a useful result
Three steps, in order. Skipping the second one is the most common reason a draft comes back thin.
Sequence matters. A framework written out of order tends to miss the steps where controls actually change.
The exposure and the site fields are where most of the useful detail usually sits. Fill them in properly.
Walk the draft against the work with someone competent. The gaps it reports are the most valuable part.
Design principles
What makes this tool behave the way it does, stated plainly.
Control suggestions are framed around elimination, substitution, engineering, administrative measures and PPE.
Assumptions and missing information are surfaced so the review does not hide uncertainty.
The result is a starting framework for RAMS conversations, not a final assessment or permit.
The review boundary
Stated here rather than buried, because a tool that overstates what it is will eventually be trusted at the exact moment it should not be.
How we approach responsible AIChoose your starting point
All four tools are live. This is the honest version of which one to open, including when the answer is a different page.
AI-generated safety support is decision support, not a substitute for a competent person, site-specific risk assessment, legal advice or formal approval. A qualified reviewer must verify every output before it is used or communicated.
Start a conversation
Tell us about your organization, your priorities and the risks you need to address. We will shape the right support around your needs.
Clear scope. Practical next steps.